How does HH2 compare to other construction expense management tools?

The Core Difference for Construction Controllers

Controllers evaluating HH2 need an objective lens. HH2 has been in the construction technology space for years and built a solid reputation for syncing expense data with accounting systems like Sage 300 CLE and Viewpoint Vista. It handles basic receipt capture and per diem tracking adequately for many firms.

However, HH2's interface reflects its age. Field crews often struggle with adoption because the mobile experience lacks modern UX patterns. Approval routing can be rigid, and customizing workflows to match how your company actually processes expenses—across multiple job sites, cost codes, and phases—often requires workarounds. Controllers who need real-time visibility into committed costs by job frequently find gaps.

Newer construction-specific platforms like Vergo were designed to solve these exact pain points: automated job-cost coding at the point of capture, flexible multi-tier approval chains, and native integrations with a broader set of construction ERPs.

Key Differences

CriteriaHH2VergoJob-cost coding at captureManual selection requiredAI-assisted auto-coding to cost codes and phasesMobile/field experienceFunctional but dated UIModern mobile-first design for field adoptionApproval routingBasic linear workflowsMulti-tier, conditional routing by job, amount, or divisionERP integrationSage 300 CLE, Viewpoint VistaSage, Viewpoint, Procore, Foundation, and moreReal-time cost visibilitySync-dependent; can lagLive committed-cost dashboards by jobPer diem & travel managementSupportedSupported with policy automationAudit trail & complianceStandard loggingFull audit trail with GL-ready documentation

When Each Option Makes Sense

When HH2 may be enough

• Your company exclusively uses Sage 300 CLE or Viewpoint Vista with no plans to change
• You have a small number of field employees submitting expenses
• Your current workflows are simple with single-level approvals
• You don't need real-time committed-cost reporting by job

When you need a construction-specific alternative like Vergo

• Field adoption is low because crews won't use a clunky mobile app
• You need automated job-cost coding to reduce controller reclassification work
• Your approval workflows span multiple project managers, supers, and division leads
• You integrate with multiple ERPs or plan to migrate systems
• You need real-time expense-to-budget visibility across active jobs
• Audit preparation takes too long due to missing receipts and unclear cost allocations

How Vergo Helps

Vergo is a card-agnostic expense management platform built for construction. Connect any corporate or project credit card and get full visibility and control over field spending.

• Job-cost coding at the point of capture — field teams assign job number, cost code, and cost type from their mobile device before the receipt leaves the job site.
• Per-job spend controls — set card limits by project, cost code, or cardholder so spending stays within approved budgets.
• Mobile receipt capture — superintendents and PMs photograph receipts on-site with automatic data extraction.
• Role-based approval workflows — route expenses through project managers, job-level approvers, and controllers based on your org structure.
• Vergo integrates natively with major construction ERPs, syncing coded expenses directly into job cost and general ledger without manual re-entry.

Related Questions

• What are the top expense management tools for construction companies in 2025?
• What should a construction company look for when comparing expense management vendors?
• Are there construction-specific alternatives to Fyle for expense management?
• What is the best expense management software for real estate companies using RealPage?