How does HH2 compare to other construction expense management tools?

Key takeaways

• HH2 provides functional expense tracking with solid Sage 300 CLE and Viewpoint Vista integrations, but requires manual job-cost coding and offers limited mobile experience for field crews.
• Vergo proposes job-cost coding by inference from your own accounting structure and history—no rule library to build, no keyword lists to maintain—and new vendors are coded on first sight with explainable AI that shows why each code was chosen.
• Modern construction expense platforms offer AI-assisted coding, flexible approval routing by job or amount, and real-time committed-cost visibility across active projects.
• HH2 may be sufficient for smaller teams using exclusively Sage 300 CLE or Viewpoint Vista with simple single-level approval needs.
• Construction firms needing automated job-cost coding, multi-tier approvals, or real-time expense-to-budget tracking typically require more specialized platforms.

What HH2 provides for construction companies

HH2 has been in the construction technology space for years and built a solid reputation for syncing expense data with accounting systems like Sage 300 CLE and Viewpoint Vista. The platform handles basic receipt capture and per diem tracking adequately for many firms. Controllers can rely on standard logging and sync capabilities to move expense data into their construction ERP. However, the interface reflects its age, and field crews often struggle with adoption because the mobile experience lacks modern UX patterns. Approval routing can be rigid, and customizing workflows to match how your company actually processes expenses across multiple job sites, cost codes, and phases often requires workarounds. Controllers who need real-time visibility into committed costs by job frequently find gaps in HH2's reporting capabilities.

Key differences between HH2 and modern alternatives

Job-cost coding represents the most significant functional difference. HH2 requires manual selection of cost codes at the time of expense entry, while newer platforms offer AI-assisted auto-coding to cost codes and phases based on vendor, amount, and historical patterns. Mobile experience varies substantially: HH2 provides functional but dated UI, whereas modern alternatives built mobile-first for field adoption. Approval routing in HH2 follows basic linear workflows, compared to multi-tier conditional routing by job, amount, or division in specialized platforms. ERP integration breadth differs as well—HH2 connects primarily with Sage 300 CLE and Viewpoint Vista, while alternatives support Sage, Viewpoint, Procore, Foundation, and additional systems. Real-time cost visibility in HH2 depends on sync schedules and can lag, whereas platforms built for committed-cost tracking offer live dashboards by job. Both support per diem and travel management, though automation of policy enforcement varies between systems.

When HH2 may be enough for your firm

HH2 serves companies with straightforward expense management needs adequately. If your company exclusively uses Sage 300 CLE or Viewpoint Vista with no plans to change accounting systems, HH2's native integration provides reliable data sync. Firms with a small number of field employees submitting expenses can manage with HH2's interface without significant adoption challenges. Companies whose current workflows involve simple single-level approvals will find HH2's approval routing sufficient. Organizations that don't need real-time committed-cost reporting by job and can work with periodic sync schedules may not require the additional capabilities of more specialized platforms. The platform's per diem tracking and standard audit logging meet basic compliance requirements for smaller construction operations with less complex project structures.

When construction firms need specialized alternatives

Field adoption challenges signal the need for a different approach. When crews won't use a clunky mobile app and receipt compliance suffers, platforms designed for field-first experiences become necessary. Controllers spending significant time reclassifying expenses benefit from automated job-cost coding that learns from accounting history. Approval workflows spanning multiple project managers, superintendents, and division leads require conditional routing that HH2's linear structure cannot accommodate. Companies integrating with multiple ERPs or planning system migrations need broader integration support. Real-time expense-to-budget visibility becomes critical when project managers make daily spending decisions across active jobs. Audit preparation that takes too long due to missing receipts and unclear cost allocations indicates the need for automated receipt chasing and comprehensive documentation trails. These operational pain points typically require platforms built specifically for complex construction expense management.

How Vergo handles this

Vergo is an AI-native, card-agnostic expense management platform built for construction. The platform proposes job-cost coding by inference from your own accounting structure and history—no rule library to build, no keyword lists to maintain, and new vendors are coded on first sight. Every coding shows why it was chosen, so a reviewer confirms in seconds instead of re-coding by hand. Approval workflows are optional and fit how you already control spend: route by GL account, by amount, or by project—or skip approval flows entirely and let policy flags catch only what breaks a rule. Employees handle everything by text message—no app to download, no portal login—and Vergo chases missing receipts itself instead of waiting for a report. Transactions are ready to code the moment they happen, with no waiting for clearing, and once they clear, they sync into your accounting or ERP software. Vergo integrates with every ERP and accounting software. Card spend, employee reimbursements and AP invoices run through one coding model—same coding, same review, one reconciliation—and payment stays on the rails you already use. Connecting your existing cards involves no card applications, no re-issuing and no banking change.

Related questions

• What are the top expense management tools for construction companies in 2025?
• What should a construction company look for when comparing expense management vendors?
• Are there construction-specific alternatives to Fyle for expense management?
• What is the best expense management software for real estate companies using RealPage?